Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 12:01PM on page 216 Are you asking if we have been requiring landscaping and site design? Yes we have. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:58AM on page 197 The purposes of this article still apply to the sections that were removed from this section and incorrectly placed in Infrastructure design section. Terrain and Stormwater Mangement and Floodplain must be added back to this section. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:20AM on page 167 Can say " In A and AE zones, as shown and defined on the FEMA FIRM panel, ... replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:19AM on page 167 We don't want to define them here, but we can reference that FEMA defines them on the FIRM replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:14AM on page 166 The title and dates are correct. It is not a city specific study. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:10AM on page 166 This section needs to be moved back where it was in the original code and the numbering should also remain the same. This section was reviewed and approved by FEMA and we don't want to change the numbering. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:08AM on page 164 See the previous comment on penalizing all property owners by some method such as disallowing any permits on the properties if the HOA is not in place. As far as "technically capable", the individuals in the HOA don't have to be technically capable of maintenance and repair, they have to have the financial means to hire someone who is. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 11:03AM on page 164 Seems like we should have some enforcement of this such as if an HOA is not active, no property in this development can obtain a building permit, or something that provides incentives to the individual property owners to ensure the HOA is active and performing their required maintenance. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 10:52AM on page 163 Should we remove the word "however"? It seems redunant. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 10:48AM on page 161 I'm not sure how submitting the archaeological studies with the permit helps anything. This section is what is supposed to be submitted at permitting. Unless someone is going to review the permit for this information, I think it would be reviewed at some other time. Or someone needs to be added to the permit review process who will review this information. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 10:44AM on page 160 This is tricky to incentivize other methods. We have to make sure they are quantifiable for future compliance monitoring. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 10:42AM on page 159 These techniques do not work in Santa Fe because we don't have the rainfall that's required for their success. We should remove this in Phase2 replies
knrios Sep 17 2024 at 10:41AM on page 28 Correct; should be "14-8.4 Landscape and Site Design" replies
knrios Sep 17 2024 at 10:41AM on page 28 Correct; should be "14-8.4 Landscape and Site Design" replies
knrios Sep 17 2024 at 10:40AM on page 28 Correct; should be "14-8.4 Landscape and Site Design" replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 10:35AM on page 66 We can address this in phase 2 to make the language more stringent. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 9:25AM on page 10 Yes, this section may be replaced with Public Works' new manual. BUT NOT previous sections. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 17 2024 at 9:23AM on page 9 Because they have incorrectly combined the terrain and stormwater management section and the flood section with the infrastructure design section, this is not true that these sections will be replaced with Public Works' future manual. These sections apply to private property and this section will not be replaced. This is why there should be two separate sections as they were in the old code. replies
cgemora Sep 11 2024 at 6:05PM on page 28 Correct. There would have to be SOME type of inclusionary housing in-order to get the 15% density bonus. Fee-in-lieu and alternative means which do not provide/include ANY on-site SFHP-compliant units would not get a 15% density bonus. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 5:15PM on page 257 Should say must have a minimum of 2" of asphalt. They can place a thicker layer if they want. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 5:15PM on page 257 We should say must have a minimum of 4" gravel surface and then at the end say that the parking lot may be asphalt. I don't think we want to limit commercial properties with less than 40 spaces from having asphalt. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 5:11PM on page 232 We have always interpreted it to mean the height of the taller wall, even if the taller wall is below the other wall. Could reword to make it more clear. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 5:03PM on page 65 Public Works would have to require this and monitor. Land Use does not have the staff or capability of checking weights of vehicles. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 5:02PM on page 61 This is possible only when the damage is directly attributable to a certain party. Someone would have to witness the damage. Damage to existing public roads should be covered in the Public Works section of the code. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:57PM on page 169 This would be tough since many properties have parking in the flood fringe and FEMA does allow it. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:56PM on page 169 Actually, there are other flood fringes identified in other arroyos in Santa Fe. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:54PM on page 10 I believe that the gabions are not allowed as armoring of the banks, but are allowed for other applications. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:41PM on page 64 maybe we just say "all structures" instead of similar structures. We do allow a cable to be mounted to posts to keep people from driving through an arroyo. So maybe we can say something like "and all structures with the exception of an approved design for a single cable strung across posts" replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:34PM on page 29 Don't see a need for it to be repeated, but not opposed to it. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:30PM on page 157 This is to prohibit equipment being placed in limited space setbacks so there is room for stormwater drainage around the equipment. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:22PM on page 68 There are other sections of the code that pertain to a flow path on private property. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:19PM on page 157 The code regulates that the "peak flow rate" cannot be increased. The word runoff is not used and probably should not be changed to runoff. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:16PM on page 156 Although ponding has its pros and cons, so do all the other methods. I'm not convinced there's a perfect solution that should be rewarded above others. Many of these alternate methods have significant issues with quantifying the volumes for future compliance and inspections of the property to verify conditions remain as required in the original drainage calculations. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:06PM on page 156 I believe a year is warranted and will reduce staff time to renew. Things happen during construction and the permit may need to stay open. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:04PM on page 154 I don't understand what this comment means. The previous section does apply throughout. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 4:01PM on page 154 Need more employees! We do our best with the few employees we have for monitoring dust. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 3:59PM on page 152 Can reference section G below that defines minor development replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 3:46PM on page 151 Probably need to discuss more before changing replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 3:44PM on page 150 THis section must always remain in Chapter 14 because it is relevant to the terrain AND stormwater management on private land development. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 3:37PM on page 149 The infrastructure section should still be located after the development and design section. There should be two separate sections in the code. Development and Design is for the development of private land and Infrastructure design is for the development of public infrastructure. The code should still have Development and Design as 14.8 and the numbering should still be relatively the same because we have references to this in many different permits and various correspondence with the public. Changing these sections so drastically in numbering will cause significant confusion when looking for code references. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 3:35PM on page 197 Development and design standards should still come before the infrastructure section of the code. replies
Dee Beingessner Sep 11 2024 at 3:32PM on page 150 Terrain and Stormwater along with all other sections that were previously in the development and design section of the code, do not belong in the Infrastructure section of the code. They apply to private land development and need to remain in the development and design section. The infrastructure section is completely different and has sections that apply to and are referenced in the original code to the applicable portions of the development and design section, but not the other way around. replies
trjurgens Sep 10 2024 at 11:44AM on page 225 Suggestion Add item: Street trees shall have a minimum separation from existing or planned City water lines as set forth in City Water Division Design Criteria. replies
trjurgens Sep 10 2024 at 11:43AM on page 219 Question Is it necessary to specify the particular backflow preventer type here or just rely on the "code" to determine what is required? replies
bubble to view comments.
Loading Glossary…
Comments
Close